Keywords
heritage
creativity
amateur art
socio-cultural institute
house of folk art
How to Cite
Abstract
This article examines the phenomenon of the Khabarovsk Regional House of Folk Art as a socio-cultural institution, and defines this institution as an institutional form. A comparative analysis of the stages of formation, historical and socio-cultural processes, allows us to identify the factors that led to the formation of a stable social structure aimed at regulating the interaction of participants in amateur art, masters of decorative and applied arts, folk crafts and creativity of the peoples inhabiting the region. In the context of studying the history of the institution, an analysis of interdepartmental relations has been carried out. Schematically presented types of interactions make it possible to determine the place in the structure of regional socio-cultural institutions, as well as to assess the degree of impact on the processes of inculturation of the region in a specific historical period. It has been established that in the early years of its existence, the Khabarovsk Regional House of Folk Art was an institution duplicating the powers of related departments, and its establishment as a socio-cultural institute took place in the 1950s. Subsequently, the House of Folk Art proved to be an institutional form capable of transforming and adapting to historical and cultural conditions, while maintaining and expanding its functionality. The result of the research is the creation of a model of the functioning of the House of Folk Art, which can be applied in the study of similar institutions in other regions. In addition, this material can be used in the practical activities of modern cultural institutions, in order to identify, on the basis of historically established forms, new types of interaction with the population of the region.
References
1. Александренко Н. Д. Развитие Дальнего Востока в советский период 1928–1942 гг. / Н. Д. Александренко, Т. Е. Каминская // Молодой ученый. – 2022. – № 23 (418). – С. 489–493.
2. Белькова А. А. Исторический институционализм – новое направление в исторических исследованиях / А. А. Белькова // Вестник Бурятского государственного университета. – 2014. – № 7. – С. 117–120.
3. Закс Л. А. Институты как социокультурный феномен / Л. А. Закс, Н. А. Стрижкова // Ярославский педагогический вестник. – 2022. – № 4 (127). – С. 186–195.
4. Салтык Г. А. Из истории становления самодеятельного хорового движения в Курской области: 1940–1980‑е годы / Г. А. Салтык // Ученые записки. Электронный научный журнал Курского государственного университета. – 2023. – № 1(65). – С. 41–49.
5. Темлянцева С. Н. Роль дома народного творчества и дома художественной самодеятельности в развитии бального танца в Алтайском крае / С. Н. Темлянцева // Исторические аспекты развития бального танца на Алтае: сб. ст. – Алтайский гос. ин-т культуры, кафедра бальной хореографии. – Барнаул: АГИК, 2022. – С. 12–17.
6. Флиер А. Я. Культурные ценности и институты: взаимосвязь понятий / А. Я. Флиер // Культура культуры. – 2022. – № 3. – [б. н.].
7. Чейкина Н. В. Сбор и сохранение фольклорно-этнографического материала на примере фонда ГАУ «Курганский областной дом народного творчества» / Н. В. Чейкина // Традиционные культуры народов России: вопросы изучения и сохранения: сб. материалов Всерос. науч.-практ. конф., Краснодар, 14 апреля 2022 года. – Краснодар: КГИК, 2022. – С. 93–99.
8. Шарковская Н. В. Социокультурные институты – деятельностная основа социально-культурной активности личности / Н. В. Шарковская // Вестник Тамбовского университета. Серия: Гуманитарные науки. – 2008. – Вып. 10 (66). – С. 257–261.
9. Genega, R. From amateurism to professionalism: Soviet Folk Art in Lviv, 1944–1953 / R. Genega // Наукові зошити історичного факультету Львівського університету. – 2024. – No. 25. – DOI 10.30970/fhi.2024.25.4539.
10. Shokirkhonov, B. Organization of amateur and professional folk choirs / B. Shokirkhonov // Society and Innovations. – 2023. – Vol. 3, No. 11/S. – P. 40–47. – DOI 10.47689/2181–1415‑vol3‑iss11/s-pp40–47.
11. Tserkovna, V. Activities of the Izmail regional house of folk arts in the post-war period (1945–1953) / V. Tserkovna // Scientific Bulletin of the Izmail State University of Humanities. Section «Historical sciences». – 2021. – No. (55). – P. 125–134. – DOI 10.31909/26168774.2021-(55)-14.
1. Alexandrenko, N. D. (2022). Razvitie Dalnego Vostoka v sovetskiy period 1928–1942 gg. [The development of the Far East in the Soviet period of 1928–1942]. Molodoy ucheniy [Young Scientist], 23(418), 489–493. (In Russ.).
2. Belkova, A. A. (2014). Istoricheskiy institucionalizm – novoe napravlenie v istoricheskih issledovaniyah [Historical institutionalism is a new direction in historical research]. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Bulletin of the Buryat State University], 7, 117–120. (In Russ.).
3. Zaks, L. A. (2022). Instituty kak sociokulturniy fenomen [Institutions as a sociocultural phenomenon]. Yaroslavskiy pedagogicheskiy vestnik [Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin], 4(127), 186–195. (In Russ.).
4. Saltyk, G. A. (2023). Iz istorii stanovleniya samodeyatelnogo horovogo dvizheniya v Kurskoy oblasti: 1940–1980‑e gody [From the history of the formation of the amateur choral movement in the Kursk region: 1940–1980‑ies]. Uchenye zapiski. Elektronniy nauchniy zhurnal Kurskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta [Scientific notes. Electronic Scientific Journal of Kursk State University], 1(65), 41–49. (In Russ.).
5. Temlyanceva, S. N. (2022). Rol doma narodnogo tvorchestva i doma hudozhestvennoy samodeyatelnosti v razvitii balnogo tancza v Altajskom krae [The role of the House of folk art and the house of amateur art in the development of ballroom dance in the Altai Territory]. Barnaul: AGIK, 12–17. (In Russ.).
6. Flier, A. Y. (2022). Kulturnye cennosti i instituty: vzaimosvyaz ponyatiy [Cultural values and institutions: the interrelation of concepts]. Cultura kultury [Culture of Culture], 3. (In Russ.).
7. Cheykina, N. V. (2022). Sbor i sohranenie folklorno-etnograficheskogo materiala na primere fonda GAU «Kurganskij oblastnoy dom narodnogo tvorchestva» [Collection and preservation of folklore and ethnographic material on the example of the Foundation of the Kurgan Regional House of Folk Art]. Krasnodar: KGIK. 93–99. (In Russ.).
8. Sharkovskaya, N. V. (2008). Sociokulturnye instituty – deyatelnostnaya osnova socialno-kulturnoy aktivnosti lichnosti [Socio-cultural institutions are the activity basis of a person’s socio-cultural activity]. Vestnik Tambovskogo universiteta [Tambov University Review], 10(66). 257–261. (In Russ.).
9. Genega, R. (2024). From amateurism to professionalism: Soviet Folk Art in Lviv, 1944–1953. Naukovі zoshiti іstorichnogo fakultetu Lvіvskogo unіversitetu [Scientific notebooks of the Faculty of history of Lviv University], 25. DOI 10.30970/fhi.2024.25.4539.
10. Shokirkhonov, B. (2023). Organization of amateur and professional folk choirs. Society and Innovations, 3(11). DOI 10.47689/2181–1415‑vol3‑iss11/s-pp40–47.
11. Tserkovna, V. (2021). Activities of the Izmail regional house of folk arts in the post-war period (1945–1953). Scientific Bulletin of the Izmail State University of Humanities. Section «Historical sciences», 55. DOI 10.31909/26168774.2021-(55)-14.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.