Abstract
The study analyzes the current state of the art of artistic enamel in Kazan in the early 20th century, which is a unique phenomenon. The relevance of studying, developing, and supporting artistic techniques and crafts that are historically associated with regions is one of the main tasks of modern history and cultural theory. Due to globalization and the spiritual and moral crisis of the individual, self-identification and a cultural code are necessary to awaken individuality and creativity. Hot enamel, which is used both as a type of decoration and as an independent art form, primarily as a stand-alone art form, is an expressive and rather difficult technique to master. Considering the subject of this article, there are traditions in the history of Kazan hot enamel as a type of jewelry, where enamel is a component of jewelry. Considering the subject of the article, in the history of Kazan hot enamel, there are traditions of jewelry enamels, where enamel is a component of jewelry, and the tradition of pictorial enamels, where this technique is the basis of an independent artistic technique. Based on the identified archival sources, interviews with artists, exhibition materials and expert opinions, the leading representatives of the Kazan enamel school of the twentieth century were identified, the dynamics of development was analyzed, and an art criticism analysis of the works was given. The historical component of the subject is arranged chronologically. The result of the work is a conclusion about the formation of the original Kazan school of enamel, which continues to develop in difficult conditions, despite objective difficulties. The further development of enamel art requires a targeted measure of support from both the art communities and the state.
References
1. Государственный архив Республики Татарстан (ГА РТ). Ф. 377. Оп. 1.
2. Государственный архив Республики Татарстан (ГА РТ). Ф. 81. Оп.1. Д. 54.
3. Государственный архив Республики Татарстан (ГА РТ). Ф. 81. Оп. 2. Ед. хр. 600. Л. 15–29; Ф. 81. Оп. 7. Ед. хр. 1659. Л. 6–16.
4. Государственный архив Республики Татарстан (ГА РТ). Ф. 81. Оп. 7. Ед. хр. 1940. Л. 33–52.
5. Гольдберг Т. Г. Русское золотое и серебряное дело XV–XX веков / Т. Г. Гольдберг, Ф. Я. Мишуков, Н. Г. Платонова [и др.]. – М.: Наука, 1967. – С. 126.
6. Интервью с Л. Г. Прис (Роденко), 2025 г.
7. Ключевская Е. П. Словарь казанских художников: вторая половина XVI – начало XX века / Е. П. Ключевская. – СПб.: Славия, 2009. – 119 с.
8. Кульпина Ю. Живопись стекла и огня // Диалог искусств. – 2008. – № 1. – С. 28–33.
9. Менгден Е. Н. История художественных ремесел Татарстана (вторая половина XIX – начало XXI вв.): дис… канд. ист. наук / Е. Н. Менгден. – Казань, 2019. – 194 с.
10. Отчет о действиях Казанской губернской земской управы за 1911 г. с приложением краткого обзора за первые 8 месяцев 1912 г. – Казань: Лито-типогр. И. Н. Харитонова, 1912. – С. 368 (данные таблицы).
11. Перфильева И. Ю. Русское ювелирное искусство XX века в контексте европейских художественных традиций. 1920–2000е годы / И. Ю. Перфильева. – М.: Прогресс-Традиция, 2016. – С. 63.
12. Рашитов Д. Д. Русское ювелирное дело Казани начала ХХ века // Сервис +. – 2025. – № 1. – С. 78.
13. Русское народное искусство на Второй Всероссийской Кустарной выставке в Петрограде в 1913 г.: каталог выставки / под ред. А. В. Прахова. [Репринт. изд. СПб., 1914]. – СПб.: Альфарет, 2008. – 132 с.
14. Столярова Е. К. Технология изготовления перегородчатых эмалей: письменные и археологические источники // Вестник Московского университета. Серия 8: История. – 2025. – Т. 66. – № 2. – С. 155–169.
15. Чавушьян Д. М. Этнические истоки развития искусства скани в Рыбной Слободе // Декоративное искусство и предметнопространственная среда: Вестн. МГХПА. – 2013. – № 1. – С. 11.
16. Ювелирные изделия на кустарной выставке // Ювелиръ. – 1913. – № 4. – С. 3–4.
1. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Respubliki Tatarstan (GA RT) [State Archive of the Republic of Tatarstan (SA RT)]. Fund 377. Inventory 1. (In Russ.).
2. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Respubliki Tatarstan (GA RT) [State Archive of the Republic of Tatarstan (SA RT)]. Fund 81. Inventory 1. File 54. (In Russ.).
3. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Respubliki Tatarstan (GA RT) [State Archive of the Republic of Tatarstan (SA RT)]. Fund 81. Inventory 2. Storage unit 600. Sheets 15–29; Fund 81. Inventory 7. Storage unit 1659. Sheets 6–16. (In Russ.).
4. Gosudarstvennyy arkhiv Respubliki Tatarstan (GA RT) [State Archive of the Republic of Tatarstan (SA RT)]. Fund 81. Inventory 7. Storage unit 1940. Sheets 33–52. (In Russ.).
5. Gol’dberg, T. G., Mishukov, F. Ya., Platonova, N. G., Postnikova-Loseva, M. M., (1967). Russkoe zolotoe i serebryanoe delo XV–XX vekov [Russian Gold and Silver Work of the 15th‑20th Centuries]. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.).
6. Pris (Rodenko), L. G., (2025). Interv’yu s L. G. Pris (Rodenko) [Interview with L. G. Pris (Rodenko) by Danil Rashitov]. (In Russ.).
7. Klyuchevskaya, E. P. (2009). Slovar’ kazanskikh khudozhnikov: vtoraya polovina XVI – nachalo XX veka [Dictionary of Kazan Artists: Second Half of the 16th – Early 20th Century]. St. Petersburg: Slaviya Publishing house. (In Russ.).
8. Kulpina, Yu., (2008). Zhivopis’ stekla i ognya [Painting of Glass and Fire]. Dialog iskusstv [Dialogue of Arts], 1, 28–33. (In Russ.).
9. Mengden, E. N. (2019). Istoriya khudozhestvennykh remyosol Tatarstana (vtoraya polovina XIX – nachalo XXI vv.) [History of Artistic Crafts of Tatarstan (Second Half of the 19th – Early 21st Centuries)]: Doctor of History’s thesis. Kazan. (In Russ.).
10. Otchët o deystviyakh Kazanskoy gubernskoy zemskoy upravy za 1911 g. s prilozheniyem kratkogo obzora za pervyye 8 mesyatsev 1912 g. [Report on the Activities of the Kazan Provincial Zemstvo Council for 1911 with an Appendix of a Brief Review for the First 8 Months of 1912]. Kazan: Lito-tipografiya of I. N. Kharitonov, 1912. (In Russ.).
11. Perfilyeva, I. Yu., (2016). Russkoye yuvelirnoye iskusstvo XX veka v kontekste evropeyskikh khudozhestvennykh traditsiy. 1920–2000‑ye gody [Russian Jewelry Art of the 20th Century in the Context of European Artistic Traditions. 1920s‑2000s]. Moscow: Progress-Traditsiya. (In Russ.).
12. Rashitov, D.D. (2025). Russian jewelry school in Kazan at the beginning of the 20th century. Service plus, 19(1), 74–80. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15169981. (In Russ.). (In Russ.).
13. Prakhov, A. V. (2008). Russkoye narodnoye iskusstvo na Vtoroy Vserossiyskoy Kustarnoy vystavke v Petrograde v 1913 g.: katalog vystavki [Russian Folk Art at the Second All-Russian Handicraft Exhibition in Petrograd in 1913: Exhibition Catalogue]. St. Petersburg: Alfaret Publishing house. (In Russ.).
14. Stolyarova, E. K. (2025). Tekhnologiya izgotovleniya peregorodchatykh emaley: pismennyye i arkheologicheskiye istochniki [Technology of cloisonné enamel production: written and archaeological evidence]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seriya 8: Istoriya [Lomonosov History Journal], 66(2), 155–169. (In Russ.).
15. Chavushyan, D. M., (2013). Etnicheskiye istoki razvitiya iskusstva skani v Rybnoy Slobode [Ethnic Origins of the Development of Filigree Art in Rybnaya Sloboda]. Dekorativnoye iskusstvo i predmetno prostranstvennaya sreda: Vestnik MGKhPA [Decorative Art and Object Spatial Environment: Bulletin of the Moscow State Academy of Arts and Industry], 1, 11.
16. Yuvelirnyye izdeliya na kustarnoy vystavke [Jewelry Items at the Handicraft Exhibition]. (1913). Yuvelir [Jeweler], (4), 3–4.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
